Hey GCRCMP,
Welcome to the forum!
I believe there are a lot of consumers stuck in the same situation as you are, as the price difference between the two is relatively negligible. From what you've indicated I would suggest the Sahara for a couple of reasons. As it seems you don't have a lot of interest in serious off-roading, the Sahara is more convenient and pleasant as a daily driver. It might even possibly be more capable, in regular driving with its LSD on the rear axel and the clutch-based transfer case can readily deal with mixed-traction scenarios (ideal for winter driving). It's also important to determine whether or not you plan on swapping to aftermarket tires, because the Sahara will require a lift for anything over 32'. As for the tops that's entirely up to you, but imo the jeep has first and foremost been a utility vehicle that doesn't require a powered roof.
Welcome to the forum!
I believe there are a lot of consumers stuck in the same situation as you are, as the price difference between the two is relatively negligible. From what you've indicated I would suggest the Sahara for a couple of reasons. As it seems you don't have a lot of interest in serious off-roading, the Sahara is more convenient and pleasant as a daily driver. It might even possibly be more capable, in regular driving with its LSD on the rear axel and the clutch-based transfer case can readily deal with mixed-traction scenarios (ideal for winter driving). It's also important to determine whether or not you plan on swapping to aftermarket tires, because the Sahara will require a lift for anything over 32'. As for the tops that's entirely up to you, but imo the jeep has first and foremost been a utility vehicle that doesn't require a powered roof.